The Magazine

Data Science & AI

Dive deep into data-driven technologies: Machine Learning, Reinforcement Learning, Data Mining, Big Data, NLP & more. Stay updated.

Quantum AI and Strategy
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
September 24, 2026

Technology is evolving at an increasingly rapid rate, and two major innovations are being explored together as quantum computing meets artificial intelligence. This was the topic of discussion for the first episode of the Open Institute of Technology’s “OPIT EDGE” podcast, which saw host Levi Mandji sit down with AI expert Matteo Zangani to talk about what comes next.


Quick Summary

  • The first episode of the OPIT EDGE podcast focused on the implications of quantum AI.
  • Quantum AI is the combination of AI and quantum computing principles.
  • It will allow AI models to process data and broaden their knowledge at unprecedented speeds.
  • Expert Matteo Zangani believes this technology could present new opportunities for humans.
  • He believes it can be used to automate tedious tasks, freeing people to become more creative.
  • OPIT’s programs (BSc in Digital Business, MSc in Responsible AI and MSc in Applied Data Science and AI) can help students expand their knowledge on AI technologies.

Introducing OPIT EDGE


OPIT EDGE is the student-driven podcast project from the Open Institute of Technology. Each episode is oriented around a specific sector of the technological world, from Web3 to software engineering, and episode one was entitled “Let’s Talk QUANTUM AI and AI STRATEGY with an Industry Expert.”


The “industry expert” in question was Matteo Zangani, CEO and tech lead at Alpha Quantaris, an innovative startup specializing in the integration of AI and quantum computing for applications in fields such as finance, logistics, and energy. Zangani is also the Manager of Artificial Intelligence and Automation at Flutter Entertainment and has experience as a Senior Data Scientist at Stellantis.


The Age of Quantum AI


At this point, AI needs no introduction. This exciting and immensely powerful technology has quickly transformed life as we know it, seeping into numerous industries and aspects of the world, automating workflows, fast-tracking processes that were once tedious and slow, and opening up countless new opportunities in fields as diverse as education, healthcare, scientific research, and marketing.


The concept of “quantum AI,” however, is still relatively little-known. In a nutshell, this term refers to the integration of two emerging technologies: AI and quantum computing. Quantum computing is an advanced type of computer processing that utilizes the laws of quantum mechanics to solve certain problems at an extremely rapid rate, potentially faster than conventional computers.


When quantum computing power meets AI agents, it’s believed that this could bring about a dramatic evolution in AI capability. Models could potentially perform certain learning and optimization tasks faster than before, which could lead to breakthroughs in fields such as:

  • Drug discovery
  • Financial forecasting
  • Cybersecurity
  • Logistics/supply chains

The State of Play


For now, quantum AI is more of a theoretical concept than an active one. The technology is still in the research and development phase and isn’t being used on a daily basis, with firms like Alpha Quantaris still exploring how it might work and the advantages it could bring. Quantum processors already exist, although large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computers suitable for broad commercial use remain under development.


The Positive Implications of This Technology


Despite the fact that true, large-scale quantum AI isn’t yet here, experts are already imagining the positive changes it could bring to the world when it finally arrives. Some of its many suggested advantages include:

  • Faster and Cheaper AI Training: In applications where quantum computing provides an advantage, quantum AI could potentially operate faster than conventional approaches. Smaller amounts of energy will be needed to level up agents’ intelligence levels and make breakthroughs.
  • Higher Accuracy: Quantum-informed AI models should be able to deliver more precise responses compared to conventional neural networks, and won’t need to use as much memory or computational power to do so.
  • Scientific and Social Breakthroughs: As quantum AI develops, it’s believed that it could contribute to breakthroughs in fields like climate science and medical research, potentially helping researchers better understand diseases and address complex challenges.

The Expert’s View


Despite the potential benefits of quantum AI, some fear that this technology could hasten the rate at which AI infiltrates industries and takes over jobs that are traditionally filled by humans. There are concerns about how humanity will cope in terms of making sure people can remain employed and earn a living when AI agents will be able to do almost everything more quickly and efficiently.


Zangani argues that this viewpoint is overly negative. He believes that humanity has already undergone civilizational shifts throughout the ages as new technologies have emerged and taken over tasks, but also opened up new opportunities, and he feels that the rise and evolution of quantum AI will play out similarly:


“If we go back two centuries, more than 90% of the people worked in agriculture, and now it’s less than 2%. But we still have a lot of jobs. So we need to embrace transformation and be open. I don’t think AI is going to replace anyone’s work, and I don’t think it’s hype at the same time. It’s a transformation period.”


He goes on to state that even in its infancy, quantum AI is already unlocking exciting opportunities, and it’s up to humanity to embrace those chances moving forward. He also believes that this type of technology will be able to automate repetitive and tedious tasks, freeing humans to focus more on creative pursuits and higher value uses of their time and energy.


Zangani’s Advice


When queried on how aspiring students and AI leaders of tomorrow can prepare for the age of quantum AI, Zangani shared his view that success in AI and tech in general isn’t just about technical skills. He notes that students will naturally need to learn skills such as Python programming and statistics, but also highlights the value of soft skills, such as curiosity, teamwork, and having a growth mindset.


For those who are just starting in this field, he suggests building projects and experimenting with AI in their free time, honing their skills and putting their passion for technology to good use. Even if some of these projects fail, he believes that this is all part of the process towards becoming a more competent professional in later life.


Key Takeaways

  • Quantum AI is an emerging technology with vast potential for scientific and social breakthroughs.
  • While there are concerns about this technology affecting jobs and employment, experts believe it will also unlock new opportunities.
  • Mastering key AI-related skills today will help students and graduates alike be better prepared when the technology becomes more widespread.

Get Ready for Quantum AI with OPIT


If you’re excited about the potential applications of quantum AI, or eager to expand your understanding of AI technology in general, the Open Institute of Technology can be the perfect point of entry. OPIT offers numerous courses oriented around AI and digital technologies, from our BSc in Digital Business to our MSc courses in Responsible AI and Applied Data Science and AI. Check out the OPIT site to learn more and apply today.

Read the article
AI-Powered Cyber Threats
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
September 15, 2026

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the cybersecurity landscape, and not just for the better. While AI-powered security solutions are proving effective at detecting and preventing cyberattacks and malicious programs, agentic AI is also being embraced by bad actors and hacking groups to make their attacks potentially more effective and dangerous.


Quick Summary

  • AI technology is taking an increasingly active role in cyber-attacks today.
  • It can identify targets, bypass protections, harvest credentials, and steal data autonomously.
  • Attacks are likely to become more sophisticated and complex as AI gets smarter.
  • The coming years will see swarm attacks, deepfake-as-a-service technology, and other new threats.
  • Those wishing to help entities defend themselves can consider an MSc in Cybersecurity at OPIT.

The Age of Autonomous Cybercrime


Autonomous cybercrime isn’t a theory or a prospective threat on the horizon; it’s an active danger, threatening businesses, governments, and individuals across the globe today. Where cyberattacks may have once involved months of planning and manual work, some attacks can now be planned and executed much faster, with significantly less human involvement.


AI can carry out reconnaissance to identify and map targets autonomously, potentially much faster than human attackers working manually. It can also be used to bypass some defensive systems, steal login details, and automate parts of an attack before conventional defenses can start to respond.


This danger is becoming more widespread, with a Signicat report finding a 2,137% increase in deepfake fraud attempts over the previous three years. The report also found that 42.5% of detected fraud attempts in the financial and payments sector involved AI.


A New Era of Cybersecurity


Before AI emerged, cybercriminals regularly developed new tools and techniques to deceive their victims, steal data, and cause chaos in cyberspace. But almost all of their attacks were manually driven. They had to do most of the hard work and heavy lifting, which effectively limited the speed, efficiency, and overall risk level of their attacks.


Now that AI has entered the equation, experts feel that the “Manual Phase” of cybersecurity is all but over, with two new phases emerging from 2022 onwards:

  • The Generative AI Phase: Beginning around 2022, this was when attackers increasingly experimented with generative AI technologies to streamline and enhance their campaigns.
  • The Autonomous Phase: From 2025 onwards, the autonomous phase involves AI not merely helping attackers, but effectively replacing them. The latest agentic models can do far more than write scam messages or generate malware; they can orchestrate complex, multi-stage attacks, at scale, while human attackers sit back and wait for the results.

The PRAR Loop


Many analysts fear that this new phase of cybersecurity could quickly spiral out of control because of AI’s propensity to become smarter and more effective at carrying out its duties as time goes by. They cite the “PRAR Loop” as the mechanism that cybersecurity businesses and at-risk entities need to be aware of from this point on:

  • Perceive: The AI reads and understands its environment.
  • Reason: It relies on its own training and data access to plan its next step.
  • Act: It puts its plans into action, rapidly and without need for human oversight or instruction.
  • Reflect: It reviews the impact of its actions and uses the results to adjust subsequent actions or plans.

This is what makes AI-powered cyber-attacks so concerning. Unlike traditional malware, which generally requires attackers to modify or redeploy it, AI-powered systems can adapt their behavior and automate iterative tasks without requiring a human to direct every step.


The Five Stages of an AI Attack


While individual attacks can vary widely in their planning and execution, a typical deepfake strike might include the following five stages:

  1. Reconnaissance: This is the point at which the AI identifies its target and learns as much about it as possible, often using publicly accessible data, like company websites, social media profiles, and press releases.
  2. Construction: Again relying on publicly available data, such as videos and audio files, the AI can construct a realistic likeness of a figure of authority within the business, such as the Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
  3. Approach: The deepfake is deployed, either in video or audio form. The attacker uses the AI-generated imitation of a real business figure to demand that a lower-level employee take some sort of action, like transferring money or sharing files.
  4. Verification: This is the stage at which attacks may be thwarted, but it depends on whether an employee takes the time to verify the deepfake figure’s identity. If they don’t, the attack will almost invariably succeed. If they do, they may realize what’s happening and take action to stop it.
  5. Result: Again, depending on what happened in the previous stage, the attack may either succeed or fail. If it succeeds, data, funds, and credentials may all be lost or stolen.

Looking Ahead



By 2027, some experts and forecasts anticipate that AI-powered cybercrime could evolve significantly, potentially enabling malicious groups to deploy coordinated, multi-agent attacks and assisting attackers in identifying vulnerabilities and developing exploits.


At the same time, there are people on the other side of the equation using AI to build better defenses and guard against these kinds of attacks, and working to level the playing field.


These “guardians of tomorrow” are already learning the tools of their trade today on courses like OPIT’s  Master’s Degree (MSc) in Enterprise Cybersecurity, which provides graduates with the technical and managerial expertise they need to develop new security solutions and lead bold cybersecurity initiatives.


Key Takeaways

  • AI-powered cyber-attacks are likely to get more dangerous in the years ahead.
  • Current attacks often revolve around deepfakes or AI-generated exploits, but new methods are likely to emerge.
  • It will be up to cybersecurity students, graduates, and experts to lead the counter-charge and develop AI-powered defenses to stop these attacks before they do damage.

Learn How to Safeguard the Systems of Tomorrow at OPIT


If you’re concerned about the rapid rise of AI-powered cybercrime and would like to play a part in stopping it, you might like to consider signing up for the MSc in Enterprise Cybersecurity at OPIT. It will give you the tools you need to build the stronger, smarter defenses that businesses are going to need to protect themselves from AI threats for years to come. Visit the OPIT site to learn more or fill out an application.

Read the article
Forbes: The Companies Winning With AI Aren’t Replacing Workers
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
August 17, 2026

Source:

  • Forbes, published on August 11th, 2026

By Gary Drenik

 

In a difficult business environment, artificial intelligence can look like an obvious answer for executives seeking faster work, lower costs and new efficiencies. But as AI moves into everyday business use, the more important question is whether those gains will last.

 

New research led by Professor Jan-Emmanuel De Neve of Saïd Business School, University of Oxford suggests companies may be making a strategic mistake if they treat AI mainly to cut headcount. The research argues that businesses focused too heavily on automation risk weakening the human capabilities they will need for growth, including creativity, judgment, institutional knowledge and leadership development.

 

“It’s a classic manifestation of status quo bias,” says De Neve. “It’s far easier for an executive to look at a spreadsheet and imagine using AI to streamline what people already do than it is to do the heavy strategic lifting of reimagining how technology can produce entirely new value. Treating AI as a headcount-slashing tool might yield quick, visible cost savings, but it is ultimately a path of organisational contraction that trades away a company’s long-term capacity to innovate.”

 

The distinction is central to AI strategy. Automation replaces tasks people currently perform. Augmentation expands what people can do, giving employees more capacity for problem solving, customer relationships and higher-value decisions.

 

A recent survey from my company Prosper Insights & Analytics shows why this matters. In its survey of U.S. adults, Executives and Business Owners were more likely than Employees to say they already use generative AI, at 53% compared with 38%. That suggests leaders may be closer to the strategic promise of AI, while employees are closer to the disruption it creates in daily work.

 

Prosper Insights & Analytics also found that 31% of employees are concerned AI will cause job losses, while 11% are concerned they personally will lose their job because of AI. A further 25% of employees say they do not trust that AI has their best interests in mind.

 

Those figures matter because AI adoption is also a trust exercise. If employees believe AI is being introduced to make them easier to replace, they are less likely to experiment with it openly, challenge its outputs or show managers where it can improve the business.

 

Professor Ashish Kumar from Trinity Business School calls this “an agency and incentive problem.” Senior leaders often see AI through the lens of strategy, efficiency and long-term opportunity, while employees deal with the practical consequences when new tools disrupt existing workflows. Kumar argues that workers are more likely to embrace AI when they feel involved in the decision, understand how it will help them, and trust that the technology is being introduced to support their work rather than threaten it.

 

De Neve argues that augmentation creates a different relationship between workers and AI. “When you choose augmentation, you unlock a compounding growth cycle. Employees engage with curiosity and agency, becoming ‘pilots’ of the technology rather than passive passengers.”

 

The danger of an automation-first approach is especially clear when companies reduce junior hiring or cut entry-level roles. These roles are often viewed as easy to automate because they involve repeatable tasks, basic analysis or administrative work. Yet they are also where future leaders learn judgment, build relationships and understand clients.

 

“When you cut human compensation and junior roles to fund technology, you hollow out your internal leadership pipeline and destroy the psychological safety required to innovate,” says De Neve. “The AI revolution will not be won by the organisations that replace people the fastest, but by those that empower them the best.”

 

The issue is not whether companies should ignore efficiency, it is whether efficiency becomes the whole strategy. Professor Guillaume Coqueret of Emlyon business school argues that AI adoption depends on both individual adaptability and organisational factors including leadership, incentives, culture and the choice of tools. Legacy organisations face a harder challenge because AI often has to be introduced into older processes, established habits and uneven levels of confidence.

 

That alignment also affects quality. One emerging risk is “workslop,” AI-generated content that looks useful but lacks the substance needed to move work forward. Alan Lerner, professor at the Open Institute of Technology – OPIT, describes workslop as “AI generated work content that masquerades as good work, but lacks the substance to meaningfully advance a given task.”

 

The danger is that AI increases output volume while shifting the burden onto employees who must check and interpret unclear work, creating the impression of productivity while increasing the effort needed to make AI output reliable.

 

Prosper Insights & Analytics data points to similar concerns. Among employees surveyed, 37% say AI needs human oversight, while 34% are concerned it can provide wrong information or hallucinations. These responses suggest many employees are not rejecting AI. They understand that its value depends on human judgment.

That judgment is harder to sustain when employees are anxious, overloaded or unsure how their work is being evaluated. Debora Nozza, Assistant Professor at Bocconi University, says AI can reduce some tasks while increasing the mental burden around others.

 

“In theory, AI should reduce the burden of work. In practice, it often changes the nature of that burden,” says Nozza.

 

Prosper Insights & Analytics also found that 17% of employees say AI makes them anxious. That does not mean AI adoption should slow, but companies need to pay closer attention to morale, training, communication and workload. If AI leaves employees less able to apply their judgment, the expected efficiency gains may prove smaller than leaders hoped.

 

The most successful AI strategies will likely be judged by more than adoption rates or cost savings. Companies will need to ask whether AI is improving work quality, helping employees make better decisions, strengthening retention and building the next generation of leaders.

 

Automation can make old processes faster. Augmentation can help companies develop new sources of value. Companies that recognise this may be better placed to turn AI from a short-term efficiency tool into a lasting source of competitive advantage.

Read full article here: Forbes

Read the article
The AI Journal: The Most Common Misconception About AI is that “Coding is Enough”
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
July 22, 2026

Source:


By Pierluigi Casale, Professor and Area Chair of AI at OPIT – Open Institute of Technology
 

If you ask a room of professionals what they should do to get ready for AI, the most frequent answer is still: learn to code. Coding is valuable, and it remains a powerful way to understand how software behaves. But the leap from writing code to leading responsibly with AI is far larger than many organisations admit. 
 

AI systems do not fail only because the code is wrong. They fail when objectives are poorly framed, when data reflects yesterday’s biases, when accountability is vague, and when human expectations are managed badly. Those failure modes are as much about people and institutions as they are about algorithms.

Why ‘learning to code’ is not the same as mastering AI

 

AI is increasingly used as a decision support layer across recruitment, marketing, customer service, credit, and risk. In each of these contexts, the hardest questions are not syntactic but normative: what counts as success, who bears the downside, and what trade-offs are acceptable. 
 

A strong programmer can build a model that predicts, classifies, or generates text. That does not automatically equip them to judge whether the model should be used, whether it is fair in context, or how it will reshape incentives inside an organisation. Treating coding as the main proxy for AI competence narrows the field exactly when AI demands broader, more interdisciplinary leadership.

AI is a socio-technical system, not a coding exercise

 

Every AI deployment is a socio-technical system: a combination of data, models, workflows, governance, users, and institutional constraints. If any one of those elements is weak, the system fails even if the model scores well in a lab benchmark. 
 

This is why frameworks such as the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and the EU AI Act stress trustworthiness, governance, and lifecycle thinking rather than technical performance alone. That emphasis is not a brake on innovation; it is what keeps experimentation from becoming harm at scale.

A four-intelligence model for the AI era

 

To work effectively with AI, we need a richer definition of capability than ‘can write code’. A useful way to frame that capability is through four intelligences: emotional, social, creative, and technological. Coding sits inside the technological domain, but it cannot carry the whole burden of responsible AI.

Emotional intelligence: designing for human reactions, not just outputs

 

AI changes how people feel about their work, their identity, and their agency. If leaders ignore anxiety, scepticism, and over-trust, they will get either quiet resistance or reckless reliance. 
 

Emotional intelligence means understanding when a system should be transparent, when it should defer to a human, and how to communicate uncertainty without eroding confidence. It also means creating psychological safety so teams can report failures early, before they become public incidents.

Social intelligence: building AI that fits real organisations

 

Most AI programmes stall not because the model is weak, but because the organisation is not ready. Data sits in silos, accountability is diffused, and incentives reward speed over quality. 
 

Social intelligence is the ability to map stakeholders, power dynamics, and decision rights, then design workflows that make responsibility explicit. It is also about understanding how AI will reshape roles, performance measures, and trust between teams, customers, and regulators.


Creative intelligence: using AI to expand imagination rather than outsource it

 

Generative AI can accelerate drafting, exploration, and ideation, but it can also flatten thinking into the average of the data it was trained on. If teams use AI only to generate more content faster, they may become less original, not more productive. 
 

Creative intelligence means treating AI as a thinking partner: a tool for exploring alternatives, testing hypotheses, and surfacing blind spots. It requires strong problem framing, good questions, and the discipline to keep human judgement in charge of what is new, relevant, and ethically defensible.

Technological intelligence: more than coding, anchored in impact

 

Technological intelligence includes software engineering, but it also includes data governance, security, evaluation, monitoring, and incident response. It means understanding model limitations, measuring performance in the real world, and designing for robustness as conditions change. 
 

It also demands an operating knowledge of emerging standards and regulatory expectations, because scale without safeguards is simply automated risk.

How organisations build responsible AI without stifling innovation

 

The fear in many boardrooms is that ‘responsible AI’ translates into slow committees and frozen experimentation. In practice, the opposite is often true: clear rules enable faster delivery because teams know what is acceptable and how to evidence it. 
 

A pragmatic approach is to separate exploration from deployment. Let teams experiment in sandboxes with synthetic or low-risk data, but require stronger assurance before systems touch customers, employees, or high-impact decisions. 
 

Treat governance as an engineering discipline. Define the use case, document the intended benefit, identify likely harms, and agree measurable thresholds for accuracy, bias, and safety. Then monitor drift and user behaviour, because the world will change even if the code does not.

Why ethics must be embedded into education and leadership

 

Ethics is too often treated as a slide at the end of an AI training course or a last-minute review by legal. That approach fails because the key ethical choices are made much earlier: in problem selection, data selection, and success metrics. 
 

International guidance is converging on the same message. The OECD AI Principles and UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of AI both stress human rights, transparency, accountability, and the need for human oversight throughout the lifecycle. 
 

Regulation is also beginning to codify expectations. In the EU, the AI Act has entered into force, signalling that AI risk management and governance will be treated as organisational obligations, not optional best practice. 
 

Embedding ethics means teaching leaders how to ask better questions: what could go wrong, who might be excluded, what data rights are involved, and what accountability looks like when the system is wrong. It also means building interdisciplinary teams where ethicists, domain experts, and frontline staff can challenge technical assumptions without being dismissed as ‘non-technical’.

Addressing common fears and misconceptions with clarity

 

The public debate about AI swings between hype and panic, and both are unhelpful. People are right to worry about privacy, discrimination, and job displacement, but those outcomes are not inevitable; they are design and policy choices. 
 

Leaders should speak plainly about what AI can and cannot do. Explain that models can be confidently wrong, that they can amplify patterns in historical data, and that they require oversight. In the UK, the Information Commissioner’s Office has issued guidance on AI and data protection that is explicitly aimed at supporting innovation whilst protecting people. 
 

Most importantly, position AI as augmentation rather than replacement. When organisations invest in the four intelligences, they can deploy AI to remove low-value work and raise the quality of human decision-making, rather than eroding trust and morale.

What AI literacy looks like in practice

 

If AI capability is broader than coding, AI education must be broader too. That means building shared literacy across roles: executives need to understand risk, product teams need to understand governance, and technical teams need to understand the human context in which their systems operate. 
 

A useful test is whether a team can answer four basic questions without handwaving. What outcome are we optimising for, and who decides that outcome is legitimate? What evidence will we collect to show the system is safe, fair, and effective after launch, not only before it? 
 

This is where the four intelligences become practical. Emotional intelligence shapes how you communicate uncertainty; social intelligence clarifies accountability; creative intelligence improves problem framing; and technological intelligence turns all of that into measurable controls and resilient systems.

A more realistic definition of AI readiness

 

Coding will remain part of the AI story, but it should not be the headline. The leaders who succeed will be those who can combine technical competence with emotional insight, social understanding, and creative judgement. 
 

If we want AI that is not merely powerful but legitimate, we have to educate and lead accordingly. The AI era will reward those who build systems that work for people as well as for performance metrics. 

Read the article
EFMD Global: New online doctorate in AI focused on real-world impact
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
July 08, 2026

Source:


An online institute founded by a business school graduate is now launching a doctorate in AI.


By Stephanie Mullins-Wiles


OPIT – Open Institute of Technology has launched a Professional Doctorate in Applied Artificial Intelligence, starting in September 2026 and delivered entirely online. 

Founded by Riccardo Ocleppo, OPIT is a remote academic institution offering fully online programmes in Computer Science and AI. Ocleppo credits his business education for impacting his entrepreneurial journey; he completed the MSc in Management at London Business School and an Executive Master’s at INSEAD. 

“I enrolled at LBS to complement my technical background with business and management acumen, as I always knew I wanted to be an entrepreneur. There, I met great professors and fellow students who significantly impacted my personal and professional growth,” said Ocleppo, also director of OPIT. 

Opit Doctorate in Applied AI

The new doctoral programme has been created in response to the growing demand for doctoral pathways to better reflect the needs of the labour market as the adoption of AI rapidly transforms processes, regulations, and organisational models.

“We are seeing a very clear demand; leaders who can use AI responsibly and productively, translating technical possibilities into decisions and results,” said Ocleppo. “This doctorate was created to fill a gap; not a programme focused solely on theory or overly narrow areas, but a doctorate that places AI at the centre as a strategic lever to tackle real challenges faced by companies, institutions, and society, with the flexibility needed by working professionals.”

Unlike a traditional PhD, which is more oriented toward academic research, this doctorate emphasises applied research with a focus on real-world impact. Assessment will consider the robustness of research alongside its ability to generate practical solutions.

“In a world where knowledge evolves at an unprecedented pace, education can no longer be considered a phase of life but must be a continuous process,” said Francesco Profumo, Rector of OPIT. “Innovative doctoral programmes like OPIT’s represent an important step in preparing professionals capable of leading technological and social change. Investing in lifelong learning means investing in the future of individuals and our societies.”

The programme is aimed at professionals, executives, and managers across technology, healthcare, finance, education, manufacturing, public policy, and consulting, as well as specialists, academics, and researchers who want to lead the adoption of AI in their field.

Applicants must hold a Master’s degree in a STEM discipline. Alternatively, candidates with a Master’s degree in another field can apply if they have at least five years of professional experience in an area in which AI has significant impact.

The programme also includes an intermediate exit option. From the second year, students who do not continue the doctorate can choose to obtain a Master of Philosophy (MPhil) in Applied Artificial Intelligence instead.

“The challenge is not just knowing what AI is, but knowing how to govern and apply it rigorously and responsibly to generate value,” said Lorenzo Livi, Programme Director. “We train professionals capable of designing and conducting methodologically robust applied research, leading AI-enabled transformation, bridging technical expertise and organisational needs, and promoting the ethical and sustainable adoption of artificial intelligence.”

 

 

Read full article here: EFMD Global

Read the article
Yahoo! Finance: Teen boys are choosing AI girlfriends over real ones for ‘maximum control, zero rejection’—experts say it could make them unemployable
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
July 03, 2026

Source:


The appeal of an AI girlfriend, one professor says, is obvious: “maximum control, zero rejection.” But it’s a shift that could kill their careers.


By Orianna Rosa Royle


Gen Z dated strategically—dating people 25% more attractive and successful than them to climb the social ladder. Gen Alpha, it seems, has decided the whole thing is too much effort. Instead, teen boys are quietly swapping first dates, awkward silences, and emotional guesswork for an AI girlfriend who never cancels, never argues, and always texts back.


In fact, research by Male Allies UK found that 20% of boys aged 12 to 16 know a peer who is “dating” an AI chatbot, while 85% have spoken to one, and over a quarter even prefer the attention and connection they get from a bot over the real thing.


Most shockingly, 58% said an AI relationship is easier because they can “control the conversation.”


The appeal is, as one professor told Fortune, obvious: “maximum control, zero rejection.” And it’s a shift that could reshape not just their love lives, but their future careers.


The toll of opting out of real relationships, in all their mess and glory, experts warn, could be a generation that arrives in the workforce unable to read a room, build trust over a coffee, or handle the one thing AI girlfriends can never prepare you for—being told no.


“The real issue is not that young people are talking to AI, but that some may start using it as a substitute for the messy, demanding work of human connection,” says Professor Pierluigi Casale, Head of AI at OPIT. “Real relationships teach negotiation, empathy, rejection, compromise, and social confidence. AI companionship can mimic intimacy whilst removing much of that friction.”


That convenience may come at a cost that stretches far beyond dating. Because the same soft skills needed to maintain a relationship are just as vital in the workplace. For example, to nail an interview, present in front of peers, or even just handle opposing opinions in the office. And it’s already lacking in younger generations who grew up with a smartphone in their hand.


Fortune has already reported that Gen Z grads are being fired at record rates—with a lack of social skills frequently cited as a key reason; That struggling to hold conversations with coworkers is already holding young workers back from promotions; And some employers are even forcing their new young hires to take on basic soft skills training, including lessons in how to speak up in meetings.


If Gen Z is already struggling, Gen Alpha—with AI companions that never push back, never need tending, and always agree—could arrive in even worse shape.


Essentially, the workplace case against AI relationships is less about romance and more about what human relationships actually teach you.


“Reading a room, picking up on social cues, building trust over coffee or a conference dinner—these are muscles you develop through practice, and practice requires real people,” Alessia Paccagnini, Associate Professor at UCD Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School, stresses.


Professor Raoul V. Kübler of ESSEC Business School puts it more bluntly: the risk is that boys dating AI are “unconsciously training themselves to expect relationships that never push back, never need tending, and never require genuine compromise. These are, however, exactly the skills that determine success in careers, friendships, and life.” And crucially, he adds, “this shift happens so gradually that most people don’t notice it’s happening at all.”


There’s one ironic upside: these boys will probably enter the workforce pretty fluent in AI—and Kübler says that knowing how to communicate with and interact with AI could give these teens a “genuine head start” over their peers when it comes to job hunting one day. “In that sense, dating an AI might be surprisingly good career preparation,” Kübler adds.


But he is clear that it’s a two-sided coin. “Real technical fluency on one side, stunted personal development on the other—and the job market will eventually demand both.”


Teen boys might think an AI girlfriend solves their immediate problems—no awkward small talk, no rejection, no risking embarrassment. But there’s a quieter long‑term cost: with fewer real‑life relationships, they’re not just dodging discomfort, they’re forfeiting access.


As Paccagnini puts it: “When you can custom-design a companion who never disappoints you, the incentive to invest in messy, imperfect real-world friendships, romantic or otherwise, diminishes. And those non-romantic ties are often the ones that open professional doors.”


Ultimately, young people who retreat into the comfort of AI companionship could be hit with a double whammy effect: They won’t just feel more socially rusty, they’ll simply know fewer people who can open doors, recommend them for roles, or whisper their name in the right room at the right moment.


Plenty of CEOs have told Fortune that early‑career friendships were vital to their growth, particularly for those who didn’t start with money or family connections.


One millennial founder, Sam Budd—who got his start working alongside Diary of a CEO’s Steven Bartlett—described escaping a childhood shaped by poverty and a heroin‑addicted father through relentless networking: showing up, asking for help, and building a web of people who wanted to see him win.


Likewise, Kurt Geiger’s CEO Neil Clifford told Fortune he went from cleaning toilets to running the Steve Madden–owned multimillion-dollar accessories brand by befriending his bosses along the way: “You want them to be fabulous—you want them to love you and want to help you.”


The common thread is not talent alone, but proximity. Being known. Being remembered. Being recommended.


Even once in the C-suite, leaders have told Fortune that they’re still turning to those connections they made at the start of their careers for genuine advice, honest feedback, and even career opportunities—decades later.


It’s why, Paccagnini warns, this shift could quietly shape a whole generation’s trajectory: “We may see long-term consequences not just for their romantic lives, but for their capacity to collaborate, lead, and build the kind of human networks that careers depend on.”


Because when the time comes to pick a successor, a partner, or a protégé, no executive is going to ask what your AI girlfriend thinks of you.


 

Read full article here: Yahoo! Finance

Read the article
Free OPIT Open Course: Data Science & AI Essentials
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
June 24, 2026

The Open Institute of Technology (OPIT) has swiftly emerged as a prominent provider of online technological education, training the leaders of tomorrow in fields like AI and data science. Typically, those wishing to benefit from this institution’s education have to enroll in one of its paid courses. However, prospective students can now get a sample of the OPIT experience via a free interactive demo course.


Quick Summary

  • OPIT is offering a free demo course in data science and AI.
  • It includes an introductory kick-off session, followed by two in-depth lecture sessions.
  • It provides a hands-on look at the OPIT curriculum.
  • The course is led by Zorina Alliata, Director of AI Enablement at Wolters Kluwer.
  • Students will learn about AI and data science applications, strategies, and implications.

All You Need to Know About the OPIT Demo Course

The OPIT Open Course in Data Science and AI Essentials offers a front-row seat to the digital economy, exploring the real-world impact AI is having while providing practical insights into the intricacies of data science. Here’s a full breakdown of what it is, who’s involved, and what you’ll learn if you choose to take part.


The Concept

The idea of this course is to simply provide an opportunity for prospective students and interested parties to experience what OPIT has to offer without having to commit to a degree right away. It’s a way for people to get a small sample of what it’s like to learn at OPIT, using the same platform as full-time students and experiencing the same kind of educational content, as well.


Typical OPIT courses involve a mixture of live lectures and pre-recorded content that is accessible at any time, on demand. This sample course works the same way. The original live lectures were held between late April and mid-May of 2026, but all of the content has since been saved and shared online, via the OPIT platform, remaining accessible to all.


The Speaker

One of the reasons why OPIT has proven so successful is its remarkable team of professors, lecturers, and experts. The institution’s rector, for example, formerly served as the Minister of Education of Italy, while many faculty members have experience working with some of the biggest brands and organizations on the planet, from Harvard Business Review to NASA.


Taking the lead on the demo course is none other than Zorina Alliata. Former Principal AI and GenAI Strategist at Amazon and current Director of AI Enablement at Wolters Kluwer, Alliata is one of the world’s leading specialists in the field of AI, especially generative AI strategy, operations, and product management.


The Content

The free OPIT Open Course is divided into three distinct sessions:

  • An introductory kick-off and orientation session to introduce you to the basics of studying with OPIT. This will also explain the “Canvas” learning platform.
  • An approximately one-hour-long deep dive session into the foundations of data science, exploring the growing value of data in business today.
  • An approximately one-hour-long deep dive session into AI strategies and the impact of this emerging technology in the real world.

During the two deep dives, you’ll learn all about how AI is transforming the digital global economy. You’ll not only be taught the basics – like key concepts and terminology associated with AI and data science – but also look at the risks and rewards associated with AI implementation and even the ethical implications of machine learning and big data.


The Objectives

By the end of this free online course, students should be able to:

  • Understand the fundamentals of AI and list some of its many use cases across a wide range of industries.
  • Assess the risks and advantages involved with AI adoption and governance, and detail some of the strategies related to its deployment and scaling.
  • Begin to develop their own AI scaling strategies, manage their own AI projects, and create organizational roadmaps related to AI and data science.

Overall, those who complete this course should feel more confident and knowledgeable about the role of AI and data in business. They may feel inspired to take the next steps in their education, which could include applying for the OPIT Foundation Program or one of OPIT’s various degree programs. They’ll also be presented with a certificate of participation, which they can add to their LinkedIn profile or CV.


How to Get Involved and Next Steps

If you’re interested in taking part in the OPIT Open Course, the good news is that it doesn’t matter if you missed the original live sessions. As stated earlier, all of the course content has been made available to watch and re-watch at your leisure, so you can enjoy the same great experience as everyone else.


All you have to do is visit this page and enter your details (name and email address). You should soon receive an email from OPIT confirming your registration, along with a secondary email explaining how to access the institution’s Canvas learning platform. From there, it’s simply a case of logging in and enjoying the sessions at a time that works for you.


Key Takeaways

  • This demo course is the perfect introduction to OPIT.
  • It’s free and accessible to all.
  • Even if you missed the live lectures, you can still watch the recordings.

Enjoy a Free Sample of the OPIT Experience Today

If you’ve always wanted to know what it was like to study at OPIT, the Open Course in Data Science and AI Essentials is the perfect place to start. It’s also an ideal choice for those with a passion or fascination for emerging technologies, like AI, as well as those wishing to broaden their horizons and deepen their knowledge of the latest tech trends shaping our world.

It might even turn out to be just the first step in a longer learning journey, leading to a possible degree or even a master’s program, like the MSc in Digital Business and Innovation. So, why wait? Head to the OPIT website and register for the free demo course today.

Read the article
Capstone Project – How to Be a Successful Entrepreneur: Maria Brilaki
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
OPIT - Open Institute of Technology
April 29, 2026

Becoming a successful entrepreneur is the dream for many aspiring inventors and creators. Maria Brilaki achieved that dream, thanks to the ability to remotely study for and achieve an MSc in Responsible Artificial Intelligence from the Open Institute of Technology (OPIT).

She recently spoke to BlueSky Thinking about her experience studying with OPIT and her resulting MedTech development. Her insights could help other budding entrepreneurs find the right educational pathway to success.

Quick Summary

  • Maria Brilaki is a successful entrepreneur and MedTech developer.
  • Learning with OPIT gave her the ability to utilize AI to create a medical device inspired by her diabetic daughter.
  • OPIT’s remote courses meant she could learn and work simultaneously.
  • The rigorous curriculum allowed her to develop her AI skills to the point where she could develop hardware.
  • Maria now hopes to make the personalized MedTech device she has created commercially available.

Meet Maria Brilaki: MedTech Entrepreneur

Maria Brilaki has had a fascinating career, first training as a civil and environmental engineer, then launching an e-learning health platform: Fitness Reloaded. She’s also written a best-selling health book and was Senior Product Manager at Fiery, a digital front-end (DFE) server and workflow solutions provider.

While working at Fiery, Maria was the lead on many AI-powered products. However, she wanted to take things further. She wanted to get to the point where she could create with AI. That required some additional training and education. For this, she went to OPIT. OPIT’s MSc in Responsible Artificial Intelligence gave her the skills she needed to create a wearable, non-invasive device for measuring blood sugar levels.

She now hopes to launch this product as a solution to painful needles and other invasive treatments and monitoring associated with diabetes.

How Maria’s Invention Works

The device brings together Maria’s passions for engineering, AI, and wellness. However, the inspiration came directly from her daughter. A few years back, Maria’s daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Since then, she’s had to endure painful injections and pin-prick blood tests, plus the skin irritation associated with current continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology. Maria noted that many current CGM devices offer delayed readings that can pose a health risk.

Maria’s solution is based on optics and how light interacts with different compounds in the skin. The device is wearable and uses near-infrared (NIR) monitoring to assess glucose levels. There are no needles or under-skin sensors, removing the pain and irritation associated with CGM.

The creation of this advanced MedTech device occurred as part of Maria’s OPIT MSc course. The course culminates in a Capstone Project and Dissertation. Students get the chance to work on a real-life project or piece of research with industrial relevance. Students can also pursue internships with relevant organizations to complement their project work.

Maria chose to solve the problem of painful CGM. Her work included the development of the device, plus a careful study of 25 participants to understand the impact of the device.

Challenges on the Road to Success

As with any new technology, there were a few bumps in the road to success. Maria noted that the physics of the problem were very challenging. Everyone’s skin compounds are unique, making the creation of patterns for monitoring tricky. She circumvented this problem by calibrating the device to the individual.

Maria also observed that being a female entrepreneur has its own challenges. Very few women-founded startups receive the same level of funding compared to their male-run counterparts. However, she said that having a working prototype, thanks to her OPIT studies, has changed conversations. In Maria’s words, “Hardware backed by data commands attention.”

What’s Next for Maria?

Maria’s ultimate goal is to remove the need for needles in blood sugar monitoring. If her device becomes widely adopted, it could take the pain out of diabetic monitoring and treatment, improving the quality of life for patients all over the world.

Without the opportunity to learn remotely with OPIT, she would never have had the chance to apply machine learning on a person-by-person basis or create a piece of AI-powered hardware from scratch. She’s now working on commercializing the prototype and gaining FDA approval for her device.

Key Takeaways

  • Entrepreneurs are more likely to achieve success with a working prototype of their product or service.
  • Remote education in tech-specific subjects can empower entrepreneurs to do more.
  • OPIT offers flexible, remote education for professionals and entrepreneurs wanting to expand their skillset.

Discover Your Own Pathway to Successful Entrepreneurship

Maria’s advice to other budding entrepreneurs is, “…focus on solving meaningful problems. The bigger the problem, the more it is worth putting your attention to. Don’t be afraid by the size of it; instead, focus on what it would mean if you were to solve it.”

You can discover the program that led to Maria’s success at OPIT. The MSc in Responsible Artificial Intelligence is a 1.5 to two-year course that you complete remotely. It’s a fully accredited level 7 course and offers opportunities to create a meaningful project and connect with businesses across multiple industries, just like Maria.

If you want more details on this program, get the brochure and discover how easy it is to get started with OPIT.

FAQ

How can an AI degree help me become a successful entrepreneur?

An MSc in Responsible Artificial Intelligence can give you the skills you need to create something unique and tailored to solving a specific problem. You’ll learn about ethics and AI, programming, data analytics, and natural language processing, which are all skills you can combine to create something purposeful and commercially viable.

Can I earn a Master’s degree in AI online?

Yes, with OPIT, you can complete an MSc in AI in as little as 1.5 years, and the course is entirely remote. The final project may involve an internship with a research lab or company, or you may decide to focus entirely on the Capstone Project and Dissertation without pursuing an internship.

How long does it take to remotely complete an MSc in Artificial Intelligence?

The course may take up to two years to complete and is classed as a full-time course. However, many learners complete the course in as little as 1.5 years and manage to balance their studies with existing commitments and jobs.

Read the article